Chittur & Associates, P.C.
Attorneys and Counselors at Law
Firm Profile

Chittur & Associates, P.C., is a friendly and small, but savvy and sophisticated, law firm. Our work ethic is uncompromising, our tenacity is unwavering, and our commitment to clients is unswerving. We handle few cases at a time, thereby ensuring focused attention to each case and get the best results for our clients. As a result of this laser-like focus, we have often obtained extremely favorable results. Whether in class actions, religious organization disputes, or in other commercial litigation and appeals, we have frequently secured judgments or optimum settlements tailored to fulfill clients' (and class') needs, whether that need is monetary or non monetary (e.g., change of a business practice).

Some Notable Recent Successes: Class Actions


In a class action against Northern Leasing Systems, Inc., Chittur obtained a landmark ruling from New York's highest court which considerably relaxed the pleading requirements for fraud against senior corporate management in cases involving massive corporate fraud. Often, corporate management is immunized from personal liability for the fraud by the pleading-with-particularity requirement: Victims are far removed from top management, and unable to meet this pleading requirement, i.e., plead details of top management's knowledge and participation. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed an amicus brief against Chittur, arguing that mere recitation of corporate officers' titles was insufficient for fraud claims. However, the N.Y. Court of Appeals rejected that argument. In an epoch-making ruling, it held that "The very nature of the scheme . . . gives rise to the reasonable inference" that the "corporate officers as individuals and the key positions they held, knew of and/or were involved in the fraud." Pludeman v. Northern Leasing Systems, Inc.

In a class action against the automobile giant Honda, Chittur secured a precedent-setting first in New York law: a preliminary injunction without the posting of any bond, convincing the Court to hold that "plaintiffs as consumers stand in the shoes of the Attorney General, who is not required to post a bond." Shaw v. American Honda Finance Corp. The action eventually settled with Honda agreeing to refund 2/3 of payments made by over 15,000 class members since October 1997.

In another class action against the HMO giant Oxford Health Insurance, Chittur secured another precedent setting first in New York law: a Court order in a highly contested class certification requiring defendants (instead of plaintiffs) to bear the cost of class notification. Makastchian v. Oxford Health Insurance. Representing a class of over 12,000 insureds, Chittur obtained summary judgment on liability as a matter of law, Makastchian v. Oxford Health Plans. After five years of bitter litigation, including 3 appeals and multitudinous motions, the case was settled on the eve of trial when Oxford finally agreed to pay class members 100% of the damages recoverable under law, and attorneys' fees and expenses.

Some Notable Recent Successes: Religious Organizations’ Disputes

  • In December 2007, Chittur successfully challenged the clandestine abrogation of all membership rights of about 8,000 members of the Hindu Temple in Flushing, Queens. The Temple trustees purported to do this with the alleged consent of barely 93 members. The Court declared the abrogation null and void, and further, that since the Temple bylaws required an election for President (and other officers), the acting Temple President had no legal authority for her office. It directed the Temple trustees to hold elections as required by the bylaws within 90 days.

    In October 2004, Chittur successfully protected the ISKCON Temple in Long Island from an attempt by the Governing Body Commission (GBC) of ISKCON to bar elections for office bearers and directors, and takeover the Temple. The Court largely denied the interim orders sought by the GBC, and is expected to try the case shortly. Kelley v. Garuda.

    In August 2003, Chittur obtained a judgment restoring membership rights in one of the oldest and largest Hindu temple in the United States. In a epoch making decision for the Hindu community and for religious organizations in general, the appellate court ordered the trustees removed, the temple reorganized, and elections for office bearers and trustees conducted under the oversight of an independant referee. Venigalla v. Alagappan, Since then, Chittur rebuffed 19 consecutive attempts by the caretaker trustees before 4 different courts to stay the elections. Elections were finally completed, and judgment entered in April 2006. However, that judgment was reversed by the N.Y. Court of Appeals on grounds which had never been raised or argued before the lower courts. Further proceedings are contemplated.

    In July 2006, Chittur represented one faction in a congregational dispute in the Hassidic Satmar Jews in Brooklyn for control of the sprawling $500 million religious empire encompassing real estate holdings, a matzo factory, a school district and other assets. Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar of Kiryas Joel, Inc. v Congregation Yetev Lev D'Satmar, Inc.

    Some Notable Recent Successes: Civil Commercial Litigation

    In December 2001, Chittur represented India Abroad, the leading Indian American publication in North America, against an India based newspaper, Gujarat Samachar, in a commercial dispute before the Manhattan federal court. After a week long trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of India Abroad for $560,000. The case was widely reported in the Indian American press; several major news reports carried verbatim transcripts of Mr. Chittur's spectacular cross examination of Gujarat Samachar's principal at trial. He then successfully prevailed against Gujarat Samachar's attempt to reopen the case. Lok Prakashan, Ltd., d/b/a Gujarat Samachar v. India Abroad Publications, Inc. In April 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. Lok Prakashan, Ltd., d/b/a Gujarat Samachar v. India Abroad Publications, Inc.

    In September 2003, the firm settled an action on behalf of several victims of a Ponzi scheme against SunTrust Bank based upon the Bank's gross indifference to mandatory provisions of banking law and practice, which indifference enabled the scheme to be perpetrated successfully. After over 2 years of litigation, the case was settled on confidential terms well above the victims' settlement expectations.

    Chittur has also settled several other cases on extremely favorable, confidential terms after tenacious litigation, including, for example, claims of 67 investors arising out of the notorious Gulati investment fraud, Chanayil v. Gulati; a travel agency's claims for bad faith lender liability, Maharaja Travels v. Bank of India; and obtained judgments in others, such as an Indian exporter’s claim for goods sold and delivered in New York,  Chaman Lal Setia Exports. Ltd. v. Sawhney.

    286 Madison Avenue Suite 1100
    New York, NY 10017
    Tel: 212 370-0447
    Fax: 212 370-0465
    Email: kchittur@chittur.com

  • 286 Madison Avenue Suite 1100
    New York, NY 10017

    Telephone: 212-370-0447
    Fax 212-370-0465
    www.chittur.com
    Home Contact Us Firm Profile Attorneys Practice Areas Some Reported Cases Publications